


Milkias: It is very difficult to read the mind of this mentally unstable regime. Even seasoned politicians and Eritrean affair observers had a hard time following and explaining the reasons behind many actions and reactions of this bizarre and weird regime. It has full diplomatic relations with Israel, it has signed a pact with Iran and had supported the US invasion of Iraq, and it is an enemy of the US!…….These shows you how odd and creepy the Asmara regime is, so it is almost impossible to correctly guess and reach conclusion behind its actions on this regard. It is a classic example of a system gone insane and out of control. Personally, I believe the president is happy all this is happening, because he gets publicity and those of us who have been following his actions know well how he craves for attention even if it means the total annihilation of the Eritrean people and their aspirations.


Al Jazeera's Jane Dutton conducts a rare interview with Isaisas Afwerki, the president of Eritrea.
Al Jazeera confronted him with the allegations about Eritrea's ties with Iran, Hamas, al Shabab in Somalia and rebel groups in Sudan and Houthis in Yemen.
"This is a deliberate distortion of facts, where is the evidence, these are fabrications, where is your evidence?", he said.
"How possibly could one blame Eritrea for sympathising or supporting one group over another in Somalia we have never done that." he said.
When asked about Eritrea's relation with Ethiopia today and the border dispute he said: "This border issue war was a senseless conflict instigated by the US.
"It is a cover up for the failures of the misguided policies of the United States in the horn of Africa for the last 20 years.

Q: The sanctions are not directed at foreign investors such as Western gold mining companies operating in the country. The regime will probably soon end up making hundreds of millions of US dollars from its mining fields and the money is likely to be used for the purchase of weapons instead of uplifting the lives of Eritreans. What should be done?
MG: Indeed, unless the government changes its destructive behavior, it is only a matter of time before members of the United Nations Security Council take the extra measure to stop any loop-holes the Sanctions may have left. I also don’t expect Nevsun, a Canadian company and the others, to disregard the fact that they are dealing with a rogue government for too long. They have to answer to their shareholders who will ask about the risk associated with partnering with a government that is at odds with its own people and the rest of the world! But the fact also remains that gold will not convert an oppressive government into one that is peaceful and democratic. There needs to be a deliberate will and ideology for a government to be one that is by the people and for the people. Gold that serves the interest of a rogue government will not stop an uprising of the people for their basic rights.

Q: The Eritrean regime believes it is in Somalia in order to weaken Ethiopia which it says might be mulling to take over Assab by force. Is that a good enough reason to side with terrorists?
A: I am not aware of this saying, but if true, then certainly that is not a good enough reason. That said, there is no doubt there is unresolved conflict between Eritrea and Ethiopia, which makes the two sides weary of each other’s actions and movements in the region. Moreover, Ethiopia with its 85 million people is now aspiring to assert its regional hegemony. As such, it is an open secret that the Ethiopian ruling elite see Somalia as part of their “sphere of influence”, and may keep trying to extend that influence to include other Horn of Africa countries and beyond. This will always raise legitimate concerns for Eritreans and non-Eritreans, and may not help regional peace and stability. Instead, there are reasonable options to integrate the Horn of Africa region through some form of Confederation and economic integration, which can potentially minimize conflicts and open the doors for political integration in the long run.




Q: Non violence as an instrument of change tends to be controversial. How do you relate such view to the Eritrean situation?
A: As we speak, more Eritreans believe that the non violent means of struggle is capable of bringing about the desired change in Eritrea than those who think otherwise. If properly utilised, non violent struggle is a viable and proven means of struggle capable of bringing about democracy and rule of law and justice than any other means. There are many examples to that effect while no country has ever achieved a genuine democracy through violent means. Non violent means aims primarily to mobilise the silent majority of the population, especially the youth, in favour of democratic change in the country. This is very important as there could be no positive change without winning the support of ordinary Eritreans who are the main beneficiaries of democratic change in our country. It also aims among other things to win the support of the international community in favour of peaceful transition towards democracy and rule of law in Eritrea.

Page 1 of 3
Please all English writers address your writing to articles@delina.org, all Tigrigna writers to tigarticles@delina.org and all Arabic writers to arabic@delina.org All writings that are not addressed to these email addresses are not going to be read or posted.
Guidelines for Posting Please Click here.
Asmarino Staff